Nycomed Canada Inc. v. Teva Canada Limited, 2012 FCA 195 (Pantoprazole*)
Justice Evans; Justice Sharlow; Justice Noël - 2012-06-25
Read full decision. Automatically generated summary:
There are two appeals from decisions of Simpson J. of the Federal Court who dismissed the appellants appeals from earlier decisions by Prothonotary Milczynski based on a single set of reasons. Simpson J. after conducting a de novo review, agreed with Prothonotary Milczynski that the plea of "contributory infringement" in the statements of defence and counterclaim filed by the appellants had to be struck as it was plain and obvious that it would fail.
Decision relates to:
- A-480-11 - NYCOMED CANADA INC., ET AL v. TEVA CANADA LIMITED which is an appeal from 2011 FC 1441 in T-368-08
- A-480-11 - NYCOMED CANADA INC., ET AL v. TEVA CANADA LIMITED which is an appeal from a decision dated 2011-12-09 in T-368-08
- A-481-11 - NYCOMED CANADA INC. v. APOTEX INC. which is an appeal from 2011 FC 1441 in T-1786-08
- A-481-11 - NYCOMED CANADA INC. v. APOTEX INC. which is an appeal from a decision dated 2011-12-09 in T-1786-08